Many organisations treat production as a destination. Ideas are developed, strategies are agreed, creative is signed off, and production is then brought in to deliver what has already been decided. It’s a structure that made sense when outputs were limited, channels were predictable, and timelines followed a largely linear path. But that world no longer exists.
Today, production doesn’t sit at the end of the process. It shapes what’s possible long before anything is made. The organisations that continue to treat production as a downstream function often discover this too late – usually at the point where ambition collides with reality.
The issue isn’t a lack of production capability. It’s the belief that production is something that can be contained within a department.
Production Is Where Organisations Confront Reality
At its core, production is not about delivery. It’s about confronting reality early enough to still influence outcomes. When production is involved early, it can reshape decisions before they become set in stone. So as an example, bringing production into initial planning is helpful as it can help highlight constraints around delivery that mean a simpler execution model is needed or a phased rollout.
Every organisation makes decisions under constraints – time, budget, capability, risk tolerance. The difference lies not in whether those constraints exist, but in when they’re acknowledged.
In many organisations, production thinking is postponed not because it is unfamiliar, but because it is inconvenient. It introduces trade-offs before momentum has fully built, complicating early optimism and forcing decisions to mature sooner than some would prefer. Consequently, these essential conversations are delayed, often until the opportunity to influence the outcome has passed.
Ideas are allowed to accumulate emotional investment before reality is introduced. By the time production is consulted, the idea has already gathered ownership, expectation, and internal validation. Constraints then arrive as disruption rather than insight, even when they are entirely foreseeable. This isn’t a production failure – it’s a cultural one.
Why Late Production Feels Like Obstruction
When production is structurally downstream, it inherits decisions it didn’t help shape, and its role becomes corrective rather than contributory. Timelines must be compressed, scope must be reduced, and risk must be managed defensively rather than deliberately.
From the outside, this often reads as resistance. From the inside, it’s simple arithmetic. Once direction has been set, options narrow quickly.
The tension that follows is frequently misdiagnosed as a collaboration problem or a mindset issue. In reality, it’s the predictable outcome of asking one group to absorb the consequences of decisions made elsewhere.
When production thinking arrives after key decisions have been made, the window for adaptability has already closed. Without the space to explore or adjust, the only path forward is rigid precision.
Culture Determines Whether Constraints Are Obstacles Or Inputs
In organisations where production is cultural rather than functional, constraints are not treated as late-stage obstacles. They are built into the initial vision, guiding the creative process instead of derailing it.
This mindset fosters meaningful change by grounding the creative process in reality. Instead of diluting the work later, trade-offs are identified early to help inform the path forward. This collaborative approach ensures that when decisions are shared, accountability follows suit.
Crucially, this doesn’t blunt creativity – it sharpens it. Projects designed with a clear understanding of their operating environment tend to be more resilient, not less ambitious. The work survives scrutiny because it was designed to withstand it.
In this sense, production culture isn’t about limiting possibilities. It’s about aligning aspiration with reality before the gap between the two becomes costly.
The Uae Context Exposes Structural Weakness Quickly
In fast-moving markets such as the UAE, the cost of deferred reality is amplified by compressed timelines and complex stakeholder environments. With visibility high and tolerance for inefficiency low, the impact of every delay is magnified.
Organisations that operate effectively in this environment tend to share a common characteristic: they don’t treat execution as a final phase. Production thinking is embedded early, not as a safeguard, but as a strategic necessity.
Why Surface-level Fixes Rarely Change Outcomes
When organisations experience friction around production, the instinct is often to optimise mechanics. New tools are introduced, roles are redefined, and processes are formalised.
These interventions can improve efficiency, but they rarely change outcomes on their own. Without cultural alignment, they become compensatory rather than corrective – attempts to manage the symptoms of misalignment rather than its cause.
Production maturity does not reveal itself in frameworks or documentation. It reveals itself in early conversations, in the willingness to surface uncomfortable questions, and in shared ownership before pressure arrives.
Until production thinking is embedded culturally, it will continue to be experienced as an interruption rather than an advantage.
Pressure Exposes Corporate Culture
Under pressure, organisations revert to their defaults, with silos reappearing, decisions becoming reactive, and responsibility deferred. In these moments, it becomes clear whether production is something the organisation relies on – or something it embodies.
Instead of focusing on where production sits within the organisational chart, leaders should ask a more fundamental question: does production thinking actively shape how decisions are made, how risks are assessed, and how outcomes are owned? Ultimately, production isn’t the final stage of a process – it is the cultural foundation that makes reaching the finishing line possible.
About Author
